2 ms·
Yes, absolutely. I certainly don't need an LLM to do something like that. When I ask for the weather, I want to know exactly what the Met Office says the weath
by throwaway150 1y ago
Yes, absolutely. I certainly don't need an LLM to do something like that.
When I ask for the weather, I want to know exactly what the Met Office says the weather is. Not what an LLM guesses the Met Office might have said, with a non-zero chance of introducing a hallucination.
This habit of inserting LLMs into otherwise deterministic tasks is frustrating. Why take something that can be solved accurately and deterministically (like parsing the Met Office's data) and make it probabilistic, error-prone, and unpredictable with an LLM?
LLMs are appropriate for problems we cannot solve deterministically and accurately. They are not appropriate for problems we can already solve deterministically and accurately.
- yoavm 1y agoI'm pretty sure the idea is to use an LLM to parse the natural language into a query, not for guessing the weather.
- throwaway150 1y agoI didn't assume either that the LLM is to guess the weather. I said that using LLM for parsing the Met Office's data is maybe not such a good idea if you can do it deterministically.
- yoavm 1y agoThe idea was "forward $@ to a LLM to make a structured request", not to parse a structured response.
- barbazoo 1y agoFun fact: The fire from a strawman this size could warm a small town for many days.
- swores 1y agoImpressively snide for such a bad point.