> If anything getting summaries might be the worse of both worlds because one might be left with the false impression of understanding where there is none. It'

> If anything getting summaries might be the worse of both worlds because one might be left with the false impression of understanding where there is none. It's bad for the individual, but even worse for the collective. The AI summary reader isn't just convinced they understand, they also share that incorrect understanding in discussion. They effectively inject LLM slop into real life conversations and forget the subjectivity of reading. This leads to what I consider more harmful. Discussions where the particiants themselves don't even believe in the stuff they are arguing. Where human beings, devoid of their own subjectivity, sling summaries and empty "facts" at each other. As if what 1984 textually said is important in any way beyond how you and I, the humans, connected with it.