3 ms·
This works pretty well in IE9 with no noticeable performance problems on a 5 year old machine. Rather scarily, it also works fine on a Lumia 710 as well! I do
by eckyptang 14y ago
This works pretty well in IE9 with no noticeable performance problems on a 5 year old machine.
Rather scarily, it also works fine on a Lumia 710 as well!
I don't care what anyone says - IE is not a stinking heap of poop.
- Kiro 14y agoContrary to what many people believe IE9 actually outperforms both FF and Chrome in many aspects. IE10 should be even better. http://www.phoboslab.org/log/2011/08/are-we-fast-yet http://www.phoboslab.org/log/2011/08/are-we-fast-yet "Of all browsers and systems I tested, IE9 subjectively produced the best results. It seems to precisely synchronize JavaScript execution with the refresh rate: the benchmark runs at exactly 60 FPS on my machine, even though the timer is scheduled every 16 milliseconds, or 62.5 FPS."
- m72 14y agoThat's because it's been baking out in the sun to the point where the poop is just dried and doesn't really stink anymore.
- eckyptang 14y agoYou can still make houses out of baked poop :) I'm not sure of the relevance of that point though :(