3 ms·

Na, sorry. The "70%" is just nonsense. And cherry picking individual benchmarks too.

• Expurple 1y ago
  > The "70%" is just nonsense. Care to elaborate why? > And cherry picking individual benchmarks too. Do you have any general, comprehensive benchmarks or statistics that would indicate the opposite? I would include one if I had one at hand, because that would be a stronger argument! But I'm not aware of such benchmarks. I have to cherry pick individual projects. I don't want to. I still claim that, as a general trend, Rust replacements are faster while also being less bug-prone and taking much less time to write. Another such example is ripgrep.