4 ms·
>> LLM's do not possess professional experience needed for successful therapy, such as knowing when to not say something as LLM's are not people. > Most people
by padolsey 1y ago
>> LLM's do not possess professional experience needed for successful therapy, such as knowing when to not say something as LLM's are not people.
> Most people do not either. That an LLM is not a person doesn't seem particularly notable or relevant here.
Of relevance I think: LLMs by their nature will often keep talking. They are functions that cannot return null. They have a hard time not using up tokens. Humans however can sit and listen and partake in reflection without using so many words. To use the words of the parent comment: trained humans have the pronounced ability to _not_ say something.
- BeetleB 1y agoAll it takes is a modulator that controls whether to let the LLM text through the proverbial mouth or not. (Of course, finding the right time/occasion to modulate it is the real challenge).
- AdieuToLogic 1y ago> All it takes is a modulator that controls whether to let the LLM text through the proverbial mouth or not. > (Of course, finding the right time/occasion to modulate it is the real challenge). This is tantamount to saying: All you have to do to solve a NP-hard[0] problem is to make a polynomial solution. (Of course, proving P = NP is the real challenge). 0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NP-hardness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NP-hardness
- fc417fc802 1y agoYour analogy would be better if it were the construction of a heuristic. GP seems to have a legitimate point though. The absence of a workable solution at present does not imply the impossibility of such existing in the not so distant future.