3 ms·
> So the outcomes are essentially random? In principle you could use CRDTs to end up with a "not quite random" outcome that simply takes the conflict into acco
by zozbot234 1y ago
> So the outcomes are essentially random?
In principle you could use CRDTs to end up with a "not quite random" outcome that simply takes the conflict into account - it doesn't really attempt to "resolve" it. That's quite good for some cases.
- dboreham 1y agoThis is a kind of CRDT. CRDT is just some papers defining reasonably clear terminology to cover the kind of eventually consistent replication that has been done for decades, including this kind (timestamp-based last-writer wins).