5 ms·
So many of the things we use today on a daily basis came from having a manned space program. It used to be that in the 1960s we were spending about 4.4% of the
by esseph 1y ago
So many of the things we use today on a daily basis came from having a manned space program.
It used to be that in the 1960s we were spending about 4.4% of the total federal budget on the space program.
Since the 1970s, it's gone down to around 0.71%.
Since the 2010s, it's gone down even further to 0.3% - 0.4%.
We've also not pushed much for talent in the federal government by way of salary and perks.
Despite these challenges, there are a whole host of technologies, medical treatments, navigational advancements, etc. we would not have without simply being in space. Even accounting for inflation adjusted dollars, the amount total spent in the history of NASA, across all programs, is absolutely miniscule to the technological and economic advancements that have come from it.
There are around 1,600 published papers with data from the ISS, and those have been collectively cited over 14,000 times by other papers.
That is a significant impact and can only be done by having people there.
- actionfromafar 1y agoWe have ad-tech now I guess.
- pfdietz 1y ago> So many of the things we use today on a daily basis came from having a manned space program. What are these? If you say "integrated circuits" I'll point out that's largely a lie, unless by "space program" you mean "Minuteman II ICBMs". "Comes from NASA" ends up meaning "NASA was tagentially involved early on". And really, how could it ever be concluded NASA was essential? You'd need to argue the counterfactual that a technology would not have been developed otherwise, and how can one do that?