3 ms·
The article has a confusing link to their methodology section. The article itself is about their "Quality of Life" ranking, which is weighted into (at 10.6%) t
by dlcarrier 1y ago
The article has a confusing link to their methodology section.
The article itself is about their "Quality of Life" ranking, which is weighted into (at 10.6%) their "Top States for Business" ranking. The methodology link in the article jumps to the "Quality of Life" section within the "Top States for Business", ranking, but the other "Top States for Business" weights aren't considered in the "Quality of Life" ranking given in the article.
If you only look at just the "Quality of Life" methodology you'll see that it's— much worse than you were thinking. There's no weights given, but of more than ten metrics considered, it looks like eight or nine of them are purely based on policy, with almost no nuts-and-bolts consideration.
- stogot 1y agoIt’s a trash article based on cherry picked data that likely fit the bias of the author. You can immediately tell what those biases are by looking at the states picked & the reasons why