> However reading some of the case law it seems that being a majority stockholder wasn’t always held the have same fiduciary responsibilities. Sounds like they

> However reading some of the case law it seems that being a majority stockholder wasn’t always held the have same fiduciary responsibilities. Sounds like they still don’t in some jurisdictions? I don't think that is relavent. As far as i understand Zuck is not being sued because he is a majority shareholder. > A blanket statement like the one I replied to oversimplifies things and implies Delaware law is federal law. I don't think anything you said disagrees with the statement you responded to. The statement you responded to never claimed that majority share holders have a fuduciary duty.