That’s a great point — and you’re absolutely right. Agentainer isn’t responsible for determining what to manage or why — it's not an orchestration brain or pla

That’s a great point — and you’re absolutely right. Agentainer isn’t responsible for determining what to manage or why — it's not an orchestration brain or planner itself. It’s designed to enable that level of automation by giving agents the tools to act. Think of it more like the runtime and control plane that an intelligent planning agent (built by the developer) can use to execute its decisions. So for example, if you’ve built a supervisor agent that analyzes workloads and spins up child agents to handle different tasks — Agentainer provides the infrastructure APIs to make that possible (create, monitor, terminate, etc.), but it’s up to you (or your planner agent) to define the logic based on business rules, goals, and evolving context. We’re not building AGI — we’re just trying to remove the DevOps wall for people building toward that vision.