4 ms·
> This is written about quite a bit. Go on.
by fknorangesite 1y ago
> This is written about quite a bit.
Go on.
- epicureanideal 1y agoIt’s sometimes difficult to find the links through Google on short notice but I found one random site that discusses this. Of course the site is pro fathers but they do link to primary sources to verify the claims in the article. There are plenty of other places this is discussed, and I’m not associated with and haven’t ever before read the following website. It just happened to easily show up in my search. https://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/the-good-life-these-chores-dont-count-on-mens-hidden-second-shift/ https://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/the-good-life-th...
- Tadpole9181 1y agoThen post the sources directly. What you linked to is obviously useless for good faith discussion?
- drooby 1y agoWhat they linked cited sources well. Quote from the original source study. "Housework was defined as “core chores,” or routine housework that people generally do not enjoy doing such as washing dishes, laundry, vacuuming floors and dusting … Routine housework, like cooking dinner or making beds, was captured … . Other activities such as home repairs, mowing the lawn, and shoveling snow were not in the study. Items such as gardening are usually viewed as more enjoyable; the focus here is on core housework." Obviously completely BS biased sexist study. It doesn't get more blatant than that.
- itake 1y agoWhen I was a kid in Florida, my sisters stayed inside learning how to knit while watching tv in the AC while I was outside in 95º Florida Humidity heat, helping my grandfather repair and maintain his home. Outdoor labor is not enjoyable.