3 ms·
They claim to undercut competitors of similar quality by half for both models, yet they released both as Apache 2.0 instead of following smaller - open, larger
by danelski 1y ago
They claim to undercut competitors of similar quality by half for both models, yet they released both as Apache 2.0 instead of following smaller - open, larger - closed strategy used for their last releases.
What's different here?
- Havoc 1y agoProbably not looking to directly compete in transcription space
- wmf 1y agoThey're working on a bunch of features so maybe those will be closed. I guess they're feeling generous on the base model.
- halJordan 1y agoThey didn't release voxtral large so your question doesn't really make sense
- danelski 1y agoIt's about what their top offering is at the moment, not having Large in name. Mistral Medium 3 is notably not Mistral Large 3, but it was released as API-only.