It seems pretty reasonable to consider the national security perspective when it seems like the potential risk is organized, nation state actors, and the potent

It seems pretty reasonable to consider the national security perspective when it seems like the potential risk is organized, nation state actors, and the potential mitigation is only the actual depth of security practices at play. To put it another way, if the air gap is the only thing preventing the malicious system from doing its malicious thing, it seems like "defense in depth" is working but there's still a problem to solve. That is, making the malicious system not malicious. > anything actually requiring clearance is serviced by the airgapped clouds and only folks with clearance are able to operate there It seems like "operate" may be doing a lot of work here.