4 ms·
> “If someone ran a script called ‘fix_servers.sh’ but it actually did something malicious then [escorts] would have no idea,” Matthew Erickson, a former Micros
by opello 1y ago
> “If someone ran a script called ‘fix_servers.sh’ but it actually did something malicious then [escorts] would have no idea,” Matthew Erickson, a former Microsoft engineer who worked on the escort system
It sounds like you may have additional context or perspective, which makes me curious about the scope of "instructs." For example, I can imagine that the deployment sources of the public and Government clouds infrastructure are different, such that a bug fix on the shared base may need to be merged between these two branches. If a foreign national made the fix for the public version and then provided the expertise of resolving merge conflicts when applying it to the Government version, it presents an opportunity for subtle abuse unless the change is either further audited by the keyboard operator or another engineer before the merge result lands or is deployed.
- richardwhiuk 1y agoGenerally it's used for fixing corrupt deployments / debugging / deploying. As far at I'm aware, there isn't a separate code base. In general, you can't share scripts / executables via this mechanism - that's done via code review and deployment. You could get an operator to run a script in a malicious way, but it'd need pre-written to include the malicious behaviour.