3 ms·

So sadlt no "V" support, but RVA22 with the 1.0 hypervisor extension and UEFI support. Four issue 2GHz OoO core. vs 1.8GHz SiFive P550: https://browser.geekben

So sadlt no "V" support, but RVA22 with the 1.0 hypervisor extension and UEFI support. Four issue 2GHz OoO core. vs 1.8GHz SiFive P550: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseline=23647778 https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseli... Is about 30% faster ST, but a lot faster MT. It's 400% faster on the MT clang compilation benchmark, so this may be a good build server. vs 1.8GHz Pi4: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseline=23667427 https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseli... vs 2.4GHz Pi5: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseline=23629891 https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseli... The lack of vector support really shows, as most geekbench benchmarks use SIMD, but MT performance is quite good.

brucehoult 1y ago
> The lack of vector support really shows, as most geekbench benchmarks use SIMD Despite that it's beating the newer gen 1.8 GHz Pi 4 (my Pi 4 is 1.5 GHz) single-threaded on everything except Image Compression and Machine Learning ... nice. If the SG2380 had happened (US sanctions prevented it, for those who don't know) we should have a RISC-V board beating the Pi 5 by now, and be less than two years behind Arm. (or three years for RK3588 Rock 5) I think we'll have something competitive with Radxa Orion O6 in the next 12 months, only 1 year behind -- and ARMv9 and RVA23 are *really* comparable in features.