3 ms·

>that arbitrarily If they had access to better data they wouldn't have to do it arbitrarily and could more accurately target problematic people. I believe ther

>that arbitrarily If they had access to better data they wouldn't have to do it arbitrarily and could more accurately target problematic people. I believe there isn't room for doing it arbitrarily as from my perspective it is a suboptimal strategy towards accomplishing one's goals. >please consider that societies are composed of living people and software is composed of 1s and 0s. I am not interested in making an emotional argument. I would be willing to hold my belief regardless of what a system is made up of.

zenapollo 1y ago
> isn't room for doing it arbitrarily as from my perspective it is a suboptimal strategy towards accomplishing one's goals. One’s goals? And if my goal were to enslave a nation of people to enrich myself and maintain power for as long as possible? > I am not interested in making an emotional argument. I would be willing to hold my belief regardless of what a system is made up of. You cannot discuss governance and civilization design without emotional arguments - i mean i guess you can you can if you lean psychopathic. I don’t mean to name call so please correct my assumptions here what you mean. Closed societies are tolerable in theory - but in theory people should be able to opt-in or opt-out. If they aren’t free to opt-out such as with a national closed society it’s not civilization, it’s slavery.