CGNAT isn't a matter of cheapness. There are more Internet users than IP addresses. Someone has to draw the short straw, and that's the providers that came late

CGNAT isn't a matter of cheapness. There are more Internet users than IP addresses. Someone has to draw the short straw, and that's the providers that came late to the party. Now, if they're doing CGNAT and also don't have IPv6, that's just crap. They shouldn't be allowed to call themselves an ISP at that point.