> Remarkably, the lone survivor wasn't Rust or Go, as many of us had predicted. It was Erlang. Rust is _more_ likely to crash than C, or I assume go. Well, mor

> Remarkably, the lone survivor wasn't Rust or Go, as many of us had predicted. It was Erlang. Rust is _more_ likely to crash than C, or I assume go. Well, more likely to panic, assert, stop, and unless you're distinguishing those cases, it's all a crash.