2 ms·

> It was predictable that law enforcement agencies would... try to enforce the law? By breaking a different one? I mean, yeah, it's predictable. But it's not

> It was predictable that law enforcement agencies would... try to enforce the law? By breaking a different one? I mean, yeah, it's predictable. But it's not great.

rayiner 1y ago
If you think that's bad, you should dig into state agency violations of PRWORA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Responsibility_and_Work_Opportunity_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Responsibility_and_Wo.... Lot's of illegal conduct going on in blue states.
- ceejayoz 1y ago
  What, this? https://www.feldesman.com/hhs-announces-major-changes-to-its-interpretation-of-prwora/ https://www.feldesman.com/hhs-announces-major-changes-to-its... > HHS rescinded its 1998 interpretation of the term (63 FR 41658) and expanded the agency’s interpretation of “Federal public benefit” to include programs, including Head Start and numerous community health-related programs. Yeah, I'm not inclined to view clear and open violations of a law the same as "the Feds said it was fine for 27 years, including Trump's first term". You'll need stronger whataboutism than that.
  - rayiner 1y ago
    There's lots of programs being funded that aren't covered by that HHS guidance.
    - ceejayoz 1y ago
      Then why don't you highlight a specific case we can talk about, rather than darkly but vaguely hinting?