> Last I checked, 1000 paper a year is more than 1200 papers in 3 years It's a metric. A good metric? Maybe not. Feels like using lines of code to measure prog

> Last I checked, 1000 paper a year is more than 1200 papers in 3 years It's a metric. A good metric? Maybe not. Feels like using lines of code to measure programmer productivity. Plus, have you controlled for factors like time allocation? If fewer research teams are getting access for longer then this would explain it