4 ms·
> A court decision ruled that he can call himself a founder. There was no such decision. They reached a settlement. That was part of the deal. > He’s not a fo
by breve 1y ago
> A court decision ruled that he can call himself a founder.
There was no such decision. They reached a settlement. That was part of the deal.
> He’s not a founder by the strict definition.
He's not a founder by the fact of the matter. He can call himself what he likes but it doesn't change history.
> It doesn’t matter
If this bores you don't get involved. But there's no need to try to stop other people talking about it.
- tomhow 1y agoI'm a moderator here and my job is to keep the standard of content and discussions high, and this is just not the kind of thing that belongs on HN. It's not new information and it's not the kind of thing that inspires interesting discussions, which is what HN is for.