4 ms·
Previous discussion (with a different user): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44333870 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44333870
by seethedeaduu 1y ago
Previous discussion (with a different user): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44333870 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44333870
- Manuel_D 1y agoThat is the same user, me. The critical used the same arguments made here: insisting that the patients weren't "actually trans", which I find unlikely for the reasons I wrote above. Not only that, they cited the retracted CAMH report to try and discredit the study author. Not only was that report retracted, CAMH had to pay the author over half a million in damages for defamation.
- seethedeaduu 1y ago> That is the same user, me I am talking about d6e