3 ms·
There's no reason to say that it's raw footage and then put it through a video editing program, so I'd say what we know now is evidence of it being deceptively
by impossiblefork 1y ago
There's no reason to say that it's raw footage and then put it through a video editing program, so I'd say what we know now is evidence of it being deceptively manipulated.
But I see you're quoting the article, so I guess you're not intending to say that it wasn't and that Wired are instead saying something ridiculous?
- erremerre 1y agoEasier than that, I do not often publish on hacker news, only when I find something that could be interesting to read the comments on. And I though the field there was for a subtitle, rather than that it was published itself as a comment. If you ask me, I am on the "conspiracy" team. Too much coincidences, to much interests, and very few plausible explanations.