4 ms·

$25 for this app is quite expensive. not sure how much I would pay for it. I would consider this only if it was completely free, open-source, and self-deployed

$25 for this app is quite expensive. not sure how much I would pay for it. I would consider this only if it was completely free, open-source, and self-deployed. so would use it only at $0.

delusional 1y ago
I am pretty sure the guy spent more effort making it than was put into 2 of these bottle openers: https://www.uncommongoods.com/product/recycled-record-bottle-opener https://www.uncommongoods.com/product/recycled-record-bottle...
- smt88 1y ago
  As far as I can tell so far, its functionality isn't much beyond a a short script that Claude could generate for me in 30 seconds or I could write myself in 20 minutes.
  - taormina 1y ago
    If you trust Claude for this, you deserve to accidentally nuke every picture you’ve ever owned.
    - smt88 1y ago
      I use Claude to write short, isolated scripts, like something to sort photos based on EXIF data, but I never just trust anything it does. I read and debug every line. I'd never let a junior dev use one of these models, but I've been coding for 30 years and know how to catch mistakes. It saves a huge amount of time.
    - antisthenes 1y ago
      Nonsense. I've done this multiple times and Claude explicitly provided a config parameter in the script to make it "read only" by default. Regardless, why wouldn't anyone test it on a small subset of your photos before trying it on a full collection? You would do it with a script you wrote personally and you should do it with an LLM script as well.
  - maccard 1y ago
    Care to share what your 20 minute script looks like?
- nikolayasdf123 1y ago
  $25 is worth month of food... https://www.scmp.com/news/people-culture/trending-china/article/3318033/thrifty-chinese-man-spends-under-us1-meal-saving-us180000-6-years-buy-flat https://www.scmp.com/news/people-culture/trending-china/arti...
rambambram 1y ago
> not sure how much I would pay for it I am sure how much you'd pay for it! Zero. Nada. None. Is what you want to pay for it. That's what you just told us in your last sentence.

$25 for this app is quite expensive. not sure how much I would pay for it. I would consider this only if it was completely free, open-source, and self-deployed. so would use it only at $0.

delusional 1y ago

I am pretty sure the guy spent more effort making it than was put into 2 of these bottle openers: https://www.uncommongoods.com/product/recycled-record-bottle-opener https://www.uncommongoods.com/product/recycled-record-bottle...

smt88 1y ago
As far as I can tell so far, its functionality isn't much beyond a a short script that Claude could generate for me in 30 seconds or I could write myself in 20 minutes.
- taormina 1y ago
  If you trust Claude for this, you deserve to accidentally nuke every picture you’ve ever owned.
  - smt88 1y ago
    I use Claude to write short, isolated scripts, like something to sort photos based on EXIF data, but I never just trust anything it does. I read and debug every line. I'd never let a junior dev use one of these models, but I've been coding for 30 years and know how to catch mistakes. It saves a huge amount of time.
  - antisthenes 1y ago
    Nonsense. I've done this multiple times and Claude explicitly provided a config parameter in the script to make it "read only" by default. Regardless, why wouldn't anyone test it on a small subset of your photos before trying it on a full collection? You would do it with a script you wrote personally and you should do it with an LLM script as well.
- maccard 1y ago
  Care to share what your 20 minute script looks like?
nikolayasdf123 1y ago
$25 is worth month of food... https://www.scmp.com/news/people-culture/trending-china/article/3318033/thrifty-chinese-man-spends-under-us1-meal-saving-us180000-6-years-buy-flat https://www.scmp.com/news/people-culture/trending-china/arti...

rambambram 1y ago

> not sure how much I would pay for it I am sure how much you'd pay for it! Zero. Nada. None. Is what you want to pay for it. That's what you just told us in your last sentence.