5 ms·
Worth to mention as another alternative: Harper[0] [0]: https://writewithharper.com/ https://writewithharper.com/
by smartmic 1y ago
Worth to mention as another alternative: Harper[0]
[0]: https://writewithharper.com/ https://writewithharper.com/
- patrakov 1y agoHarper is so basic that I can't recommend it. Does not catch a singular/plural discrepancy between the subject and the verb in a sentence--a common mistake when the expressed thought applies equally to one thing or to many things. Does not catch a missed indefinite article--a common mistake for speakers of languages that don't have articles. Similarly, does not catch the use of the indefinite article for a thing already mentioned before. Does not even catch the obvious "don;t" typo.
- clay10 1y agoHave you raised these as issues? The developer has been extremely responsive in my experience. I use Harper in my Neovim setup and its been great. I just add things that are missing from the dictionary when I come across them in my codebase
- speckx 1y agoOpen ticket about "don;t" typo, see https://github.com/Automattic/harper/issues/1559 https://github.com/Automattic/harper/issues/1559
- patrakov 1y agoThat's mine! And it's already fixed; I am indeed amazed by the developer's responsiveness.