3 ms·
"completely out of touch" is definitely an exaggregationg. Besides, as if competition would really increase quality. Where I dwell, we have around 3 active de
by lynx97 1y ago
"completely out of touch" is definitely an exaggregationg. Besides, as if competition would really increase quality. Where I dwell, we have around 3 active delivery services. Only 1 of them has an app with useable UX, icnluding accessibility. Competition? Meh. What for? So that I can watch the smaller guys blunder their way to the top?
- motorest 1y ago> "completely out of touch" is definitely an exaggregationg. Is it, though? I mean, can you present a coherent argument supporting the idea that a global market being dominated by 5 multinational corporations does not flag a risk of anticompetitive practices? > Competition? Meh. What for? So that I can watch the smaller guys blunder their way to the top? Is this what you have to offer to refute the idea you're completely out of touch?
- potato3732842 1y agoIf by "coherent" you mean the Webster definition then yeah, anyone can. If by coherent you mean "using only facts and opinions that I accept at face value within my world view" then no. Personally, I think 5 is way too little. But there are probably some markets for various products and services where 5 is fine. I don't think the number matters so much as that there be potential for a long tail of upstarts who could potentially displace a big player quickly. Whether 95% of the market is captured 2 or 22 players doesn't matter, they gotta know that someone is waiting to take their place if they screw up.