4 ms·
1) Overexposure. Same problem that Georgia has: Otherwise a very serviceable Matthew Carter design. 2) It's a screen font. In print and display applications,
by qu1j0t3 1y ago
1) Overexposure.
Same problem that Georgia has: Otherwise a very serviceable Matthew Carter design.
2) It's a screen font.
In print and display applications, it really does look gross.
Source: A Friendly neighbourhood typographer
- Cockbrand 1y agoTwo very relevent XKCD comics: https://xkcd.com/1015/ https://xkcd.com/1015/ https://xkcd.com/3113/ https://xkcd.com/3113/ Source: someone who picked up a bit of knowledge about typography, but never used it professionally
- rbanffy 1y agoNo curse is worse than having a fine taste for kerning.
- criddell 1y ago> It's a screen font. With the pixel density of typical displays these days being as high as they are (phones are often 300-400+ PPI), I think this distinction isn't what it used to be.