3 ms·
Instead of citing an AI, why don't you cite an actual reputable source? Those facts it ingested and regurgitated no doubt came from somewhere, and you're clearl
by Klonoar 1y ago
Instead of citing an AI, why don't you cite an actual reputable source? Those facts it ingested and regurgitated no doubt came from somewhere, and you're clearly attempting to use the facts to prove a point. An authoritative source is more helpful than attributing it to [insert ai bot here].
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- almosthere 1y agodisagree
- RamblingCTO 1y agoyes, a "source" that's widely known for producing false information is a reliable source, you're right.
- almosthere 1y agothe data is so fucking obvious (everyone knows there are massive OD and suicidality in this moment), of course people are going to be pedantic about the source and not debate the merits of the argument.
- RamblingCTO 1y agohowever you want to spin it, the source is always important. again, especially if it tends to fabricate things. don't be lazy and research a proper, first order source and not a parroted parody of a source. you're intellectually lazy, so why would anyone want to discuss with you? https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db522.htm https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db522.htm > 105,007 in 2023 heavily picking up since around 2015