> The problem is with 0.05 criterion. That's certainly one problem -- many have argued that it's too easy to meet this evidentiary standard, which explains why

> The problem is with 0.05 criterion. That's certainly one problem -- many have argued that it's too easy to meet this evidentiary standard, which explains why so many weak, non-replicable psychology papers get published. You comment comparing psychology to physics is apt -- the evidentiary standard in hard science fields is much higher.