I'm not saying state funding is bad or private funding is good. I'm saying that having a mixture of both provides checks and balances to moderate the influence

I'm not saying state funding is bad or private funding is good. I'm saying that having a mixture of both provides checks and balances to moderate the influence of both. > Adding the misinformation about being "promoted based on political loyalty" is a strong sign of your bias I'm talking about countries like China and India, where folk medicines have been politicized, lateral movement into the bureaucracy is non-existent, and criticism against TCM and Aryuveda is being slowly suffocated.