4 ms·
This is not the main reason people would choose HBase. For time series data HBase is much better at load balancing the data and at storing the same data in sequ
by dialtone 14y ago
This is not the main reason people would choose HBase. For time series data HBase is much better at load balancing the data and at storing the same data in sequential blocks so that in a single operation you can fetch all of the data points that are interesting. Cassandra supports range queries but the last time I saw it wasn't super awesome at load balancing data across nodes when using the OrderedPartitioner. Do I remember wrong?
- jbellis 14y agoTime series works very well on Cassandra. If anything, avoiding global-ordering hot spots is a Good Thing. http://rubyscale.com/blog/2011/03/06/basic-time-series-with-cassandra/ http://rubyscale.com/blog/2011/03/06/basic-time-series-with-... http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/advanced-time-series-with-cassandra http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/advanced-time-series-with-c... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-fYqPu2ciQ&feature=youtu.be http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-fYqPu2ciQ&feature=youtu...