> So the report throws out essentially the entire body of research for failing to meet an impossible to meet standard. This is disinformation that is easily sh

> So the report throws out essentially the entire body of research for failing to meet an impossible to meet standard. This is disinformation that is easily shown to be false if you read the final report. In fact this lie was so widely disseminated that the authors felt they had to address it in the FAQs on the Review website: https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/final-report-faqs/#accordion-default-1-heading-2 https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-r... > Did the Review reject studies that were not double blind randomised control trials in its systematic review of evidence for puberty blockers and masculinising / feminising hormones? > No. There were no randomised control studies identified in the systematic reviews, but other types of studies were included if they were well designed and conducted.