4 ms·
You're right; also, apparently, Gibson said he hadn't seen Tron as late as March 1983, and he finished a draft of Neuromancer before that August https://www.boo
by leoc 1y ago
You're right; also, apparently, Gibson said he hadn't seen Tron as late as March 1983, and he finished a draft of Neuromancer before that August https://www.bookbrunch.co.uk/page/free-article/neuromancer-the-birth-of-an-sf-classic/ https://www.bookbrunch.co.uk/page/free-article/neuromancer-t... . (Though this also confirms that he had seen Tron stills in mid-1982, though that's still well after both "Burning Chrome" and the Jacked In outline (both 1981)). OTOH the similarities to Blade Runner have never really been hard to explain: if you cross film noir and hard-boiled with New Hollywood and '70s malaise fiction then it's natural to end up with something a bit like Blade Runner and so also Neuromancer, while on the other hand there are of course huge differences between the two as well.
- EdwardCoffin 1y agoThanks, I'd not seen that particular article before, and it has some things in there I'd not read in any of his other interviews. I think the article I got his take on Blade Runner from was the Paris Review [1] which is archived here [2] [1] https://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/6089/the-art-of-fiction-no-211-william-gibson https://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/6089/the-art-of-fi... [2] https://archive.is/qmwKj https://archive.is/qmwKj