3 ms·

The Cost of Human-Centric Tools in LLM Workflows

• zdw 1y ago
  Having used multiple code review tools (Gerrit, Phabricator), GitHub's code review is frankly one of the worst UX's for humans to use for this purpose (go try to review a rebased patchset, or have to wade through the inefficient use of space in the UI), so I'm not surprised AI has trouble with it as well.
  • bckmn 1y ago
    Agreed. I think this is why we’re seeing a lot of new wrappers being built like Graphite.
    • jacobegold 1y ago
      a lot? what are the other ones?
      • bckmn 1y ago
        In exploring `gh` CLI extensions recently I found at least 2 devoted to being a better PR review interface. I've also seen [Trag](https://usetrag.com/ https://usetrag.com/) and others pop up.
      • codeapprove 1y ago
        Some others which are good: * Reviewable * Codestream (formerly GitContext) * Codelantis * CodeApprove (biased, obviously)
  • edvaldodfreitas 1y ago
    You can try out Kodus (https://kodus.io https://kodus.io)