> Having made the proper introductions (unecessary, you could have read the history of the Itamaraty and inferred why I answered that way), now you are better e

> Having made the proper introductions (unecessary, you could have read the history of the Itamaraty and inferred why I answered that way), now you are better equipped to talk with me. If you don't do that and go back to leader vs leader nonsense, I will assume ill intent. You sound like a teenager that learned about diplomacy and the Itamaraty recently and thinks everyone else is an ignorant. > You are free to disagree, of course, and cheer for your favorite leader. But in that case, you need to do it in another sub-thread. I do not welcome that kind of discussion. Yeah. Here we go again. Your way to argue is really, really weird. I will just say that I agree with everything you said prior this part and leave you to discuss with your imaginary opponents alone.