4 ms·

This wasn't really the point of the article, which in fact says the workaround was patched in Chrome 118.

• irrational 1y ago
  Because the author reported it. Personally I would have told the ublock origin developers instead of google.
  • Wowfunhappy 1y ago
    To what end? So Google can see how it works and still patch it?
    • deryilz 1y ago
      Yeah, this was my thought process. I get the appeal, but I don't think a million-user open-source extension is gonna start relying on a clear bug to function.
    • scotty79 1y ago
      At least it would make them work for it.
      • Wowfunhappy 1y ago
        It would be creating more work for the Ublock Origin developer[1]; as far as I can tell it wouldn't be creating any extra work for Google, which has to patch the issue anyway. 1: Assuming he even elected to do it; I know I wouldn't.
        • account42 1y ago
          According to the article it would have been two additional lines for the extension developers.