4 ms·
No judgement but I would love to hear from Google employees who worked on this. Do they believe they are improving the internet in any way?
by ujkhsjkdhf234 1y ago
No judgement but I would love to hear from Google employees who worked on this. Do they believe they are improving the internet in any way?
- cindyllm 1y ago[dead]
- stackedinserter 1y ago"Job's shit but pays a lot"
- lucb1e 1y agoThere is also an argument to be made that adblocking is immoral. I think the idea is pervasive enough to fill a team of willing people, especially if you pay them 100k/year to at least go along with it for the time being I haven't made up my own mind about it yet, just that this might be a factor in why one would move the facilitating technology backwards in this way (and forwards in other ways, apparently: some people in the thread are reporting that uBlock Lite is faster. Not that I can tell the difference between a clean Firefox without add-ons (I regularly use that for work reasons) and a Firefox with uBlock Origin (my daily driver) except if the page is bogged down from all the ads)
- ujkhsjkdhf234 1y agoI don't think ads are immoral but I think the way FAANG does ads and tracking is immoral. Google does not do enough to vet ads for malicious activity such as scams and viruses. The FBI in recent years has started recommending an adblocker for that reason.
- yard2010 1y agoLol. Treating cancer is immoral. Miss me with this shit!
- paulryanrogers 1y agoAdvertising is cancer?
- asadotzler 1y agoYes. Advertising is inherently manipulative, a cancer not of the brain, but of the mind. Advertising is also a exploitation vector. Removing a security threat that's damaging my mind is like removing a physical health threat that's damaging an organ.
- userbinator 1y agoThey are being paid to think what they're told to think.