3 ms·
No, a "naive" approach to reporting what happened is better. The knowing, cynical approach smuggles in too many hidden assumptions. I'd rather people explained
by skybrian 1y ago
No, a "naive" approach to reporting what happened is better. The knowing, cynical approach smuggles in too many hidden assumptions.
I'd rather people explained what happened without pushing their speculation about why it happened at the same time. The reader can easily speculate on their own. We don't need to be told to do it.
- bryant 1y agoThe 21st century has, among all the other craziness that's happened, proven that people do need to be told what to believe and why to believe it. Doing otherwise leaves a vacuum someone else will fill, often with assertions in an opposite direction.
- skybrian 1y agoWhat vacuum? There's certainly no lack of people sharing strong opinions. I think the market is pretty saturated?