2 ms·
>ignoring the costs of facilities, salaries, non-cloud hardware, etc. If you lease, those costs are amortized. It was definitely more than $5M, but I don't thi
by moralestapia 1y ago
>ignoring the costs of facilities, salaries, non-cloud hardware, etc.
If you lease, those costs are amortized. It was definitely more than $5M, but I don't think it was as high as $100M. All things considered, I still believe Deepseek was trained at one (perhaps two) orders of magnitude lower cost than other competing models.
- rpdillon 1y agoPerhaps. Do you think DeepSeek made use of those competing models at all in order to train theirs?
- moralestapia 1y agoI believe so, but have no proof obviously.