5 ms·
Are they? Cursor's Accept / Reject feature for each change it makes in each file is nice whereas I have to use a diff tool to review the changes in Claude Code
by warmedcookie 1y ago
Are they?
Cursor's Accept / Reject feature for each change it makes in each file is nice whereas I have to use a diff tool to review the changes in Claude Code.
Also, if I go down a prompt alley that's a dead end, Cursor has the Restore Checkpoint feature to get back to the original prompt and try a different path. With Claude Code, you had better have committed the code to git, otherwise you end up with a mess you didn't want.
My company pays for both, but I mostly use Cursor unless I know I am doing a new project or some proof of concept, which Claude Code might have an edge on with a more mature TODO list feature.
- Unearned5161 1y agoI got burned too many times from that Restore Checkpoint thing not working right, maybe it's been fixed by now but seems silly to rely on something thats not a literal tool built for the job (version control), not a good shortcut.
- pqdbr 1y agoIt has worked perfectly for me every time, and it’s such a great feature.
- reasonableklout 1y agoGemini CLI uses a shadow git repo and commits after every change, won't be long before Claude Code has that too.
- cpursley 1y agoThat’s a neat idea!
- mindwok 1y agoNone of these features are very deep though, there’s dozens of OSS clones for them already.
- rvnx 1y agoRooCode/Cline, etc