4 ms·
As far as I can tell, terminal agents are inferior to hosted agents in sandboxed/imaged environments when it comes to concurrent execution and far inferior to a
by wagwang 1y ago
As far as I can tell, terminal agents are inferior to hosted agents in sandboxed/imaged environments when it comes to concurrent execution and far inferior to assisted ide in terms of UX so what exactly is the point?. The "UI niceties" is the whole point of using cursor and somehow, everyone else sucks at it.
- rhodysurf 1y agoYou’re missing the point tho. The point of the cli agent is that it’s a building block to put this thing everywhere. Look at CCs GitHub plugin, it’s great
- wagwang 1y agoCC on github just looks like Codex. I see your point, but it seems like all the big players basically have a CLI agent and most of them think that its just an implementation detail so they dont expose it.
- extr 1y agoNot sure what you mean. "Hosted agents in sandboxed/imaged environments"? The entire selling point of CC is that you can do - > curl -fsSL http://claude.ai/install.sh http://claude.ai/install.sh | bash - > claude - > OAuth to your Anthropic account Done. Now you have a SOTA agentic AI with pretty forgiving usage limits up and running immediately. This is why it's capturing developer mindshare. The simplicity of getting up and going with it is a selling point.
- gk1 1y agoPlus it’s straightforward to make Claude Code run agents in parallel/background just like Codex and Cursor, in local sandboxes: https://github.com/dagger/container-use https://github.com/dagger/container-use