> Stop looking at LLMs look at the 10 year trendline of ML as a wholistic picture Exactly. Just 100 years ago AI did not exist at all. Hell, (electronic) compu

> Stop looking at LLMs look at the 10 year trendline of ML as a wholistic picture Exactly. Just 100 years ago AI did not exist at all. Hell, (electronic) computers did not even exist then. In that incredibly short timeframe of development AI is coming very close to surpassing what took biological evolution millions of years (or even surpassing it in specific domains). If you take the time it took to go from chimp to human compared to the time it took from the first animal to chimp and assume that scales linearly to AI evolution, we are very, very close to a similar step there. Of course, it's not that simple and the assumption is bound to be wrong, but to think it might take another 100 years seems misguided given the rapid development in the past.