4 ms·

I’m sorry, but Wikipedia is not a trusted source, especially after October 7th it’s just filled with propaganda. Here: https://www.camera.org/article/contradic

I’m sorry, but Wikipedia is not a trusted source, especially after October 7th it’s just filled with propaganda. Here: https://www.camera.org/article/contradicting-its-own-archives-new-york-times-expulsion-escape-of-haifas-arabs/ https://www.camera.org/article/contradicting-its-own-archive... Paints completely different picture based on the NYT reporting of the time. So, as I said: my point still stands.

DiogenesKynikos 1y ago
You complain about bias, but then cite a website that is quite explicitly an Israeli propaganda operation. Are you denying that the Haganah launched a massive attack on the Arab neighborhoods of Haifa in April 1948, driving the population to flight? That's just a plain historical fact. Denying that is like saying the US Civil War didn't happen.
- reliabilityguy 1y ago
  > but then cite a website that is quite explicitly an Israeli propaganda operation. You mean the NYT reporting of a time is an Israeli propaganda? Can you prove that or you simply dismiss this evidence because it doesn’t suit your narrative?