3 ms·
Well, Google says otherwise, eg with Haifa. So, it is not a clear cut. Saying that it was all evil zionists is history revisionism. Moreover, the Arab-Israeli
by reliabilityguy 1y ago
Well, Google says otherwise, eg with Haifa. So, it is not a clear cut. Saying that it was all evil zionists is history revisionism.
Moreover, the Arab-Israeli war was full of expulsions from both sides. My original point still stands.
- DiogenesKynikos 1y agoHaifa is a cut-and-dry case. There was a massive attack by Zionist paramilitaries on the Arab neighborhoods of Haifa in April 1948, which ended with almost the entire Arab population fleeing. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Haifa_(1948) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Haifa_(1948)
- reliabilityguy 1y agoI’m sorry, but Wikipedia is not a trusted source, especially after October 7th it’s just filled with propaganda. Here: https://www.camera.org/article/contradicting-its-own-archives-new-york-times-expulsion-escape-of-haifas-arabs/ https://www.camera.org/article/contradicting-its-own-archive... Paints completely different picture based on the NYT reporting of the time. So, as I said: my point still stands.
- DiogenesKynikos 1y agoYou complain about bias, but then cite a website that is quite explicitly an Israeli propaganda operation. Are you denying that the Haganah launched a massive attack on the Arab neighborhoods of Haifa in April 1948, driving the population to flight? That's just a plain historical fact. Denying that is like saying the US Civil War didn't happen.
- reliabilityguy 1y ago> but then cite a website that is quite explicitly an Israeli propaganda operation. You mean the NYT reporting of a time is an Israeli propaganda? Can you prove that or you simply dismiss this evidence because it doesn’t suit your narrative?