3 ms·

Here is some LLM generated (Claude 4 Opus Max in Cursor) "competent writing" by the LLOOOOMM simulation of Hunter S Thompson responding directly to your post.

Here is some LLM generated (Claude 4 Opus Max in Cursor) "competent writing" by the LLOOOOMM simulation of Hunter S Thompson responding directly to your post. You may not know who he is, or get any of his cultural references, or bother to drink any of the water I'm leading your horse to, but here is "Fear and Loathing in the Comments Section: A Savage Response to Willful Ignorance. Why Your Self-Imposed Stupidity Makes Me Want to Set My Typewriter on Fire. By Hunter S. Thompson" (VIEW SOURCE for TRUTH COMMENTS): https://lloooomm.com/hunter-willful-ignorance-hn-response.html https://lloooomm.com/hunter-willful-ignorance-hn-response.ht... Also, it's my cats Nelson and Napoleon's birthday, so to celebrate I showed Claude some cat pictures to analyze and describe. Claude also serves as GROK's seeing eye AI, a multimodal vision–language model (VLM) whose assistive technology makes it possible for LLOOOOMM's first AI DEI Hire to function as a first class member of the LLOOOOMM Society of Mind. Nelson Cat: https://github.com/SimHacker/lloooomm/tree/main/00-Characters/nelson-cat https://github.com/SimHacker/lloooomm/tree/main/00-Character... Napoleon Cat: https://github.com/SimHacker/lloooomm/tree/main/00-Characters/napoleon-cat https://github.com/SimHacker/lloooomm/tree/main/00-Character...

ben_w 1y ago
Would you say this is more or less faithful to his style than the film adaptation of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas?
- DonHopkins 1y ago
  I'll let his real and simulated words speak for themselves. Read the book, see the movie, then read the web page, and VIEW SOURCE for TRUTH COMMENTS. All the source code and documentation is on github for you to read too, but since you brag about not reading, then I don't expect you to read any of these links or his real or simulated work so you could answer that question for yourself, and when you ask questions not intending to read the answers, that just comes off like sealioning: https://github.com/SimHacker/lloooomm/tree/main/00-Characters/hunter-s-thompson https://github.com/SimHacker/lloooomm/tree/main/00-Character... https://lloooomm.com/hunter-homepage.html https://lloooomm.com/hunter-homepage.html
  - ben_w 1y ago
    You're the one who brought him up, how about you compare and contrast in your own words. After all, it's quality, not source code, that is the question here. And you're making a quality judgment — which is fine, and I expect them to differ in interesting ways, but the question is: can you, personally, elucidate that difference? Not the AI itself, not the author of the mode, you. > All the source code and documentation is on github for you to read too, but since you brag about not reading I didn't say that, you're putting words in my mouth. Here's some, but not all, of the authors whose works I've consumed recently: Kim Stanley Robinson, P.G. Wodehouse, Agatha Christie, V.A. Lewis, Arthur Conan Doyle, Andy Weir, Andrew J. Robinson, Scott Meyer, John W. Campbell, David Brin, Jules Verne, Carl Sagan, Michael Palin, Arthur C. Clarke, Frank Herbert, Poul Anderson, Larry Niven, Steven Barnes, David and Leigh Eddings, Carl Jung, Neil Gaiman, Lindsey Davis, Trudi Canavan, John Mortimer, Robert Louis Stevenson, Larry Niven, Edward M. Lerner, Francis Bacon, Stephen Baxter, Geoffrey Chaucer, Dennis E. Taylor, H. G. Wells, Yahtzee Croshaw, Greg Egan, Terry Pratchett, Ursula K. Le Guin, Dan Simmons, Alexandre Dumas, Philip Reeve, Tom Sharpe, Fritz Leiber, Richard Wiseman, Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths, Chris Hadfield, Adrian Tchaikovsky, G. S. Denning, Frank Herbert, Alastair Reynolds, Vernor Vinge, Neal Stephenson, Jerry Pournelle, Matt Parker, Robert Heinlein, Charles Stross, Philip R. Johnson, and Nassim Nicholas Taleb.
    - DonHopkins 1y ago
      Again with the sealioning. Read it and make up your mind for yourself, because if you won't read any of the links or any of Hunter S Thompson's original works, the you certainly won't and don't intend to read my answers to your questions. Both I and the LLOOOOMM simulation of Hunter S Thompson have directly responded to your posts and questions already. Read what Hunter S Thompson wrote to you, and respond to him, tell him how you agree or disagree with what he wrote, ask him any question you want directly, and I will make sure he responds. Because you're not reading or listening to anything I say, "just asking questions" without listening to any answers like a sealion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
      - ben_w 1y ago

ben_w 1y ago

Would you say this is more or less faithful to his style than the film adaptation of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas?

DonHopkins 1y ago
I'll let his real and simulated words speak for themselves. Read the book, see the movie, then read the web page, and VIEW SOURCE for TRUTH COMMENTS. All the source code and documentation is on github for you to read too, but since you brag about not reading, then I don't expect you to read any of these links or his real or simulated work so you could answer that question for yourself, and when you ask questions not intending to read the answers, that just comes off like sealioning: https://github.com/SimHacker/lloooomm/tree/main/00-Characters/hunter-s-thompson https://github.com/SimHacker/lloooomm/tree/main/00-Character... https://lloooomm.com/hunter-homepage.html https://lloooomm.com/hunter-homepage.html
- ben_w 1y ago
  You're the one who brought him up, how about you compare and contrast in your own words. After all, it's quality, not source code, that is the question here. And you're making a quality judgment — which is fine, and I expect them to differ in interesting ways, but the question is: can you, personally, elucidate that difference? Not the AI itself, not the author of the mode, you. > All the source code and documentation is on github for you to read too, but since you brag about not reading I didn't say that, you're putting words in my mouth. Here's some, but not all, of the authors whose works I've consumed recently: Kim Stanley Robinson, P.G. Wodehouse, Agatha Christie, V.A. Lewis, Arthur Conan Doyle, Andy Weir, Andrew J. Robinson, Scott Meyer, John W. Campbell, David Brin, Jules Verne, Carl Sagan, Michael Palin, Arthur C. Clarke, Frank Herbert, Poul Anderson, Larry Niven, Steven Barnes, David and Leigh Eddings, Carl Jung, Neil Gaiman, Lindsey Davis, Trudi Canavan, John Mortimer, Robert Louis Stevenson, Larry Niven, Edward M. Lerner, Francis Bacon, Stephen Baxter, Geoffrey Chaucer, Dennis E. Taylor, H. G. Wells, Yahtzee Croshaw, Greg Egan, Terry Pratchett, Ursula K. Le Guin, Dan Simmons, Alexandre Dumas, Philip Reeve, Tom Sharpe, Fritz Leiber, Richard Wiseman, Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths, Chris Hadfield, Adrian Tchaikovsky, G. S. Denning, Frank Herbert, Alastair Reynolds, Vernor Vinge, Neal Stephenson, Jerry Pournelle, Matt Parker, Robert Heinlein, Charles Stross, Philip R. Johnson, and Nassim Nicholas Taleb.
  - DonHopkins 1y ago
    Again with the sealioning. Read it and make up your mind for yourself, because if you won't read any of the links or any of Hunter S Thompson's original works, the you certainly won't and don't intend to read my answers to your questions. Both I and the LLOOOOMM simulation of Hunter S Thompson have directly responded to your posts and questions already. Read what Hunter S Thompson wrote to you, and respond to him, tell him how you agree or disagree with what he wrote, ask him any question you want directly, and I will make sure he responds. Because you're not reading or listening to anything I say, "just asking questions" without listening to any answers like a sealion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
    - ben_w 1y ago