4 ms·
Subsidizing big business and the rich is the American way. Just look at how much money we spend on the old vs the young.
by linotype 1y ago
Subsidizing big business and the rich is the American way. Just look at how much money we spend on the old vs the young.
- aiaisiskbs 1y agoYep, same deal with birth rates and immigration. Instead of taking money from the rich to enable more native births we import cheap/exploitable labor. The wealthy don’t bear the cost but reap the benefits. And they’ll hand wave some trickle down economics argument about GDP going up to say we all benefit. Same exact logic as increasing everyone’s rates due to datacenter demand.
- jakelazaroff 1y agoTo be clear: the issue is not the immigration itself but that we allow wealthy people and corporations to exploit immigrants, right?
- vkou 1y ago> taking money from the rich to enable more native births Wealthier, more cohesive and communal and less-unequal societies, with better education and medical and child care support across the world have dramatically fewer native births than the US. Unless you're planning on forcing women to have children at gunpoint[1], or banning all forms of contraception[2], or making everyone stupid and poor[3], there doesn't seem to any way to raise birthrates in industrialized societies. Exploitation of migrant/temporary/undocumented workers is a separate problem. --- [1][2][3] These do seem to all be on the roadmap for people whose political sails are most closely aligned with nativist anxieties. And I have not a drop of tolerance for any of them.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- NekkoDroid 1y agoSocialize the cost, privatize the profits. That has been The American Way and will for the forseeable future remain that way. Neither party is really interested in fixing it, just one of them is less inclined in furthering it as much as the other.
- supportengineer 1y agoBe an executive or shareholder, or be gone with you