3 ms·
Technically it’s not really hypocritical because the author never claimed that a lack of light mode is an accessibility problem. I think it’s also notable that
by dangus 1y ago
Technically it’s not really hypocritical because the author never claimed that a lack of light mode is an accessibility problem.
I think it’s also notable that websites being accessible isn’t really about being tied to a specific theme, it’s about being compatible with accessibility tooling and standards (screen readers as an example). There are plenty of CSS manipulation tools that can make a website look whatever way you want.
- nosioptar 1y agoThen all that'd apply to sites not having a dark theme, undercutting the author's point because he could just use stylus to.make his own dark theme for sites.
- Davidbrcz 1y agoAnd if I understand you right, you completely miss the point of the article. I'm already resorting to tools and workarounds (ie Dark mode reader, invert image extensions, invert colors on phone). But - they are workarounds, cumbersome, and don't always work well. - I'm tech-savvy, if you are not and suffer the same condition, you are fucked. Builtin dark mode on websites and apps would just be net benefit for me for little cost.
- pseudalopex 1y agoYou understood them wrong I think. dangus seemed to suggest CSS manipulation tools were enough for people who wanted a light theme.