2 ms·
Virtually nobody said that it would go under in a year because that makes no sense. It's financially possible for it to tread water for years whilst losing mone
by michaelmrose 1y ago
Virtually nobody said that it would go under in a year because that makes no sense. It's financially possible for it to tread water for years whilst losing money.
I don't see how this could be deemed a success when a magic 8 ball or a hamster attached to a giant pile of money could keep it going as long.
- bitlax 1y agoLol the overwhelming tech jerk opinion was that he was firing elite engineers and the site would be unmaintainable as a result, and that he had over-leveraged himself to the point of bankruptcy.
- michaelmrose 1y agoHe can't go bankrupt in any sane length of time whilst having the dragon hoard he has. I think you are cherry picking a few folks and assigning them the roles of "the public". He's probably at more risk of falling out a window Soviet style than poverty. It probably is unmaintainable but it was already feature complete at time of purchase.