> He runs a small business that makes good money, and it > happens to use technology. Not the same thing. As opposed to what? Having no business (making no m

> He runs a small business that makes good money, and it > happens to use technology. Not the same thing. As opposed to what? Having no business (making no money), hyping everything out of proportion and having technology for technology's sake? > if by "great" we mean innovative Any justification for this lame definition? I call the service great if it is really useful for customers and make money for the owners. Sure, inventing a way to put pants on over your head may be innovative, but how it is great and what's the point? I got pretty tired of all that useless social hypeware with no purpose (other than burn VC's money) and business model.