> As with a lot of judge rulings, and what they're always supposed to do, they ruled on what the actual law is and not just on what sounds good. A "lot" of jud

> As with a lot of judge rulings, and what they're always supposed to do, they ruled on what the actual law is and not just on what sounds good. A "lot" of judicial rulings do indeed follow that pattern. But there have been mulitple high-profile & high-stakes examples recently of just the opposite. To the point where I thought you were making a joke at first.